site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of July 10, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

13
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tier One is where HBD, sex differences and such innate factors are recognized, but only myopically: people stick to the defensible, scientifically rock-solid motte of standardized aptitude measurements, merit, and economic optimality.

Tier Two is where science is thinner, but subtle effects add up to extremely ugly conclusions. This is where you understand, among all else, that it's never just about IQ or SAT;

Is it the tier where you leave quokka island and get thing called opsec, where you grok that 120 IQ pencil pusher who can be trusted is preferable to 160 IQ creative genius with sus behavior and connections who might be working for something or someone else?

The tier where you, for example, understand you should not hire for sensitive position in your business graduate from prestigious university with perfect score who just happened to be born in well known mob family? Where you, for example, understand you should not hire for great power super duper secret weapon project people who are overtly sympathetic to another great power?

These conclusions do not look to me as overly ugly, but I never identified myself as quokka.

that a great share of MtFs are not «women in man's body» or «men deluded about being women» or even «perverts» but something far more problematic

What "super problematic thing" you are hinting at here? Transgenderism as ancient demon waking up?

Imagine that small group of illuminati communists castration fans walked the long march through institutions from obscure 90's Usenet discussion group all the way up to top world's professional association deciding global standards of health care.

Imagine that old well connected and respectable billionaire mafia family decided to throw their money and influence for for the issue of gender affirming care.

Imagine global pharma industry enthusiastically jumping on the bandwagon, and then imagine that Western propaganda machine made this cause into new hip thing and made gender affirming treatment the coolest thing ever, with the whole democratic, free and civilized world following suit.

This is far more depressing and blackpilling matter that any schizophrenic ooga booga stuff can ever be.