Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 167
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The US is weird among Western countries in that the government doesn’t heavily subsidize highbrow arts, which means seeing opera, large orchestras, ballet etc is very expensive if you want non-shit seats.
In Europe, probably 80% of the average opera ticket is government funded. Almost all orchestras are substantially state-funded. Ballet is very heavily funded. ‘Higher brow’ theater (at both the avant garde end and the by-the-book Shakespeare end) is very much subsidized too.
I think this affects cultural perception in an interesting way. In the US, going to see these things isn’t necessarily a rich people thing (there are plenty of schoolteachers and college professors at Rachamaninov at the NY Phil), but it has the cultural cachet of being higher brow, higher class, and above all older, since young people aren’t paying $130 a ticket (even the cheap seats are like $90). In Britain/France/Germany, a lot of the audience to these kinds of things pay $20 a seat because they’re so heavily subsidized, so you see a lot more students, young people in general.
In the end, the European approach is preferable. The government wastes so much money on supporting the bottom of society that, at the very least, a few billion for the legitimate high culture of this civilization is owed and earned.
You can get cheap seats for under $30 and there is typically a student discount. The price is not the issue.
At the NY Phil? Not to something good, and not in seats that offer even a somewhat decent experience.
it was you who brought up the cheap seats
"Students can purchase $25.00 (including fees) rush tickets for select concerts up to 10 days in advance both online and in person at the David Geffen Hall Welcome Center. "
the vast majority of Americans do not live in or near NY
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
This doesn't really make sense an an explanation. First, Americans tend to have more disposable income than Europeans to begin with. Secondly, tickets for the sporting events, EDM concerts and other low brow media are even more expensive, yet extremely popular.
Yes, because they’re more popular. Nobody’s denying that 22 year olds will save up to spend $3000 on Taylor Swift tickets, but that doesn’t mean their price sensitivity on high culture is zero.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
This does not check out.
EU spends more on the bottom and supposedly the top.
Ideal is spend on neither. Let the market decide what the "people" want.
Lesser of two evils is where you spend on A instead of A and B.
I'm assuming you want less spending because you say the government "wastes". So.. why would you want them to.. "waste" more?
Because if I’m paying 45% marginal income tax that seem extremely unlikely to change under any foreseeable government, I think at least they should use some of my money to fund things I enjoy.
“The man” is always going to take a big chunk of what you have, at least I’d like some of it to be returned to me.
Unprincipled, but understandable.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link