This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Ok so I’m not understanding what people think Prigs goal was if it was not overthrow. He marched on Moscow unopposed. What didn’t he expect? Actually making it to Moscow and having a bloody battle? What were the alternate scenarios? Putin crushes Wagner faster or Putin made a faster proposal to make Prog happy? Or I he could have assumed more of the military would have backed him.
I have a big issue in not being able to see what scenerio Prog thought would play out. Putin telling Prog I love you bud here’s Shogs and Gerasimovs heads is the only better scenerio I see he could have expected other than taking power.
The 4-D chess scenerios just seem way out there because it made Putin look weak and that Moscow is exposed to the next general with some troops.
You’re forgetting here that Wagner Group are mercenaries. Mercenary armies marching against the cities which hired them happens all the time throughout history. They don’t do it because they want to overthrow the regime. They do it because they want to get paid.
I do not know the financial situation of Wagner. Perhaps this is not about payment in money. Maybe Russian troops really did fire upon Wagner mercenaries. What’s clear is that Prigozhin felt ripped off, and as a mercenary leader, marching his army to the doorstep of the palace is a tried and true method of litigating counterparty risk. It’s much easier for Putin to give these guys what they want than it is to risk urban warfare in Moscow.
“Merceneries”. These aren’t men without a country. They are still Russians. I don’t know the exact amount they have better pay, but they aren’t guys fighting for a random flag paying them more money.
I... don't have a good model of how mercenary these mercenaries are or how committed to Russia they are. I can definitely imagine having citizenship in a state and still having far more stake in my mercenary group than in that state. Especially in a state like Russia. And I think the believability of that is what makes marching on the capital a viable tactic for getting paid. (believability because, you don't even need to intend to ever follow through as long as you can win the game of chicken.)
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
There is no next general. The army is gelded and atomized; they could only support an external force articulating their dissatisfaction with S&G. And they failed to support that force.
Yes, I think Prig desperately gambled on Putin fearing general mutiny and loss of control of big parts of the army, and personally guaranteeing, overriding S&G's authority, that all attempts of MoD to absorb Wagner are hereby terminated. When it became clear that the army, for the moment, won't seriously stop him from getting to Moscow, but also won't actively help him fight whatever loyalist forces Putin can muster, and that Putin doesn't plan to give up on S&G or their plans, he folded. The key reason was probably high-ranking Army figures like Surovikin refusing to endorse the mutiny.
Kamil Galeev thinks there are more coming and he seems to have been right more than mosts. Putin looked weak. You just need a general popular with other generals. Or you could see a break away Republic by a local governor or some oligarchs. Siberia is where the wealth comes from so with the army artitted perhaps a few oligarchs try and take over some wealth. Who knows there are many possible scenerios that I don’t know enough about local power structures to know what they can do. When you lose a world war you usually lose your empire.
Galeev is a delusional Turkic supremacist and tries to conjure his dreams of Russian dissolution into reality with prolific twitter posting. He has been right exactly once – predicting that Russia will not succeed at conquering Ukraine, the rest is downstream of that take; but this could have been and was predicted by anyone with a modicum of insight into Russian system, e.g. me.
This obsession with signaling is predicated on the idea that people in power don't know the real state of events and have to infer them from tea leaves and gestures, and is exactly why most popular analysis is hopeless. Looks don't matter, only actual capabilities. Putin looks like a pitiful monkey and he has been looking this way for a long time, but he has proven still having the capability to make Wagner run. This is enough. It'll be cold comfort for a rebelling general to know that as he dies, he's taking a few batallions' worth of FSO with him.
So, Surovikin? He's refused to join the mutiny.
There isn't anyone. Putin has worked extraordinarily well to purge every charismatic figure from the army. Killing people cooler than him is his whole edge.
Yes, well, which republic? Tyva or Chechnya, maybe. If Kadyrov and Shoigu remain "loyal", this doesn't happen. Governor, oligarchs – haha, as if.
Russia can well unravel, don't get me wrong. But this will have very little to do with the fact that Putin has looked weak the other day.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link