site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1yr ago (text post)   38489 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of June 5, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

8
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is giving me some gamer boycott energy. There's no other real Reddit alternative with nearly the same amount of content thanks to network effects, so while a handful of users might drift away, the majority will eat the changes no matter how much they might dislike it.

Yes but this is going to change the communities. There is a minority of profilic users that drive the "usefullness" for people and if they leave... you got tumblr energy instead.

Yeah, that article about Tumblr made me laugh. It's a hellsite, but one advantage of it is There Is No Algorithm. It's not Twitter, and Lil' Miss Lemme Weep Into My Lace Hanky about Tumblr's sad state is really lamenting that she can't use it like Twitter and Instagram and TikTok to Build Her Brand and Monetise Her Content and Become A Thought Influencer.

Tumblr is constantly trying, and failing, to monetise content. We who remain after The Female Presenting Nipples Purge may be the dregs (they still haven't cleared out the pornbots) but we're the dregs who are fiercely proud of our dumpster trash home.

This is not to say that it's not run terribly (God bless their hearts, they keep trying to sell us merch) and that there hasn't been a ton of churn and selling it off at lower and lower valuations, but this "staff vision of how to make it better!" is precisely what pisses off long-term users and turns new potential users away:

"Our users are very opinionated, vocal, and passionate," explains Kahle. During her tenure, users simultaneously adored the platform while being resistant to changes that could save it, and "there were very few product updates that we rolled out that were not received poorly." Though she sympathizes — "any time Instagram redesigns their homepage I'm annoyed, too" — Tumblr users wouldn't let go. "A year later, we'd still get comments from users being like, 'literally no one asked for this stop changing things' or 'we want porn back.'"

I'm not one of the "we want porn back" crowd but even in the few years I've been there, they do keep making stupid changes that make the site less user-friendly and make content creation for the people who do art and video uploads way, way more difficult. The reason we say "nobody wants your stupid changes" is because nobody wants their stupid changes.

The porn ban of 2018 was a defining event for Tumblr that led to a 30 percent drop in traffic and a mass exodus of users that blindsided the company.

That is because it was done so awfully that it was in fact hilarious. See above about "female presenting nipples", that was the actual official line they put out. If your nipples presented as male, no problemo! Presumably non-binary nipples were also okay.

People started sharing the images that got their blog marked as "porn, for deletion unless you appeal". Sand dunes - okay, if you're using dumb AI (this was back in 2018) then they can kinda look like breasts. But bread? Grass? Totally innocuous images that don't even have people in them?

To add insult to injury, there are still real pornbots infesting the site to this day that never got banned in The Great Think Of Our Profits We Mean The Children Purge:

Tumblr has historically struggled to monetize effectively, and Christian recalls that in addition to being a legal and public relations nightmare, porn on the platform was a financial death knell. "We were told that we can't make money if we have any explicit content on our site, that specifically advertisers that will give us a substantial amount of money to keep things running will not come here."

Thing is, Tumblr is not one thing. There are vast and vastly different experiences depending on what blogs you follow and what interests you have, and you needn't ever interact with a blog side-by-side with yours because both of you are completely different themes - maybe they're about cosmetics and baking, and you're into swords and astronomy. That makes it really, really hard to turn into a slick, marketable product for advertisers and potential buyers.

Post+, a recent first step toward paywalled content to the platform, was met with disdain and frustration. Although the feature was completely optional, users protested that monetizing fan-created works negated the fair use of copyrighted characters and stories and put creators at risk of legal action. Post+ was a beta test, but "I think that users thought it meant that the entire platform would eventually become sort of like subscription-based," says Kahle.

Because it damn well would have become subscription-based if they got away with it. Users are not stupid, a lot of us migrated over from LiveJournal etc. and we know how this dance goes.

In January, D'Onofrio said that half of the platform's active users and 71 percent of its new users are Gen Z. Kahle who, at 25, is a zillennial, says attracting Gen Z and getting them to stay "may come down to the product." For example, Kahle says "if Gen Z's attention span is whatever percent shorter than millennials' then the recommendation algorithm needs to be used to churn out content way faster."

A lot of newbies came over from Twitter and the entire point is that there is no algorithm. Your experience is not curated. If you want to get your stuff noticed, you need to have people follow you, reblog, and like your content. And there's no magic shortcut to get that to happen, no paid content (well, you can Blaze but that does not necessarily mean you'll get followers or interaction), no Top Blogs Of The Day on a frontpage - you have to do the work yourself.

Fascinating stuff. As someone who was never big into Tumblr, it's interesting to see how one of the Internet's major sites shot itself in the foot.

I came to it late and for very restricted reasons (following a family member who got a Tumblog) and stuck around for fandom interaction. There are entire ecosystems on Tumblr that never interact, I've been lucky in avoiding the infamous Tumblrinas but yeah, the default attitude there is "liberal to progressive" and it skews young, though not as young as commonly thought - a lot of users are in their thirties or older.

They keep selling it off to new buyers who try in vain to monetise it, which is funny to watch. People are posting a lot of guides about Welcome To Tumblr (like this one) for the refugees from Twitter and Reddit. Mostly things like "We don't got no hashtags round here" because the experience is so different 😀

Reddit is hardly unique. It exists as the dominant platform for its niche because it was better at it when the last one collapsed. It continues to coast off network effects, but is not big as Facebook where it can not be supplanted.

"aaaaaany day now the big Reddit-killer will swoop in and save us! Trust me bro!"

I know it's certainly possible, but Reddit would have to screw up way harder than it has. The current drama won't make much of a difference.

Reddit lost it's catch as an organically driven community and later a free speech platform years ago. For at least a decade or thereabout, the site's been heavily botted, manipulated, and driven itself into self-referential echo chambers that cater to low-effort content. I think the things that made Reddit interesting in a strong sense of the word, are always destined to be things that don't scale up very well, but that you only find in smaller and decentralized communities. Those echo chambers are already floating by into places like Lemmy. I know, because I wasn't even there a week before a site admin banned me.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats