site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of June 5, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

8
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I figure that most people in this community are good rationalists and dismiss UFOs/UAPs/"non-human intelligences" out of hand.

Sort of?

I have to conserve a little bit of probability for the fact that it is possible that some nonhuman intelligence

A) Exists in the galaxy; and

B) Was able to send probes to our planet.

A) is just the Fermi paradox, I have little to add to that discourse. If we consider B), though, any intelligence that was able to send probes out to other planets can probably design them to be extremely difficult for a sub-Kardashev 1 civilization to detect, much less capture.

So I am actually willing to believe that we are being observed by aliens who are so extremely good at psyops and stealth and misinformation that they can make it impossible to verify their existence and what little evidence we have is simply so inconclusive that only the most conspiracy-minded would jump to the conclusion of alien interlopers.

The question of why they would simply observe us and never visibly interfere or attempt contact is an open one, but hardly a full refutation.

End of the day the idea isn't inherently more loopy than the simulation hypothesis. But in both instances there's not much for a good rationalist to DO with this information and thus it kind of just falls out of the equation pending further evidence.

And of course, this doesn't lend any credence to any particular person's account of alien encounters or conspiracies of alien overlords. I'm not saying I believe any particular theory or story.