site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 15, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

9
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It stands to reason that if there weren't any Jews, then there would be much less in the way of pornography and casual sex generally.

So true.

This is why there was no pornography in ancient world before it was influenced by Jews.

This is why pornography was unknown in Christian countries of old where only handful of Jews lived, for example 18th century France and Britain.

This is why there is no pornography today in countries where never were any Jews, countries that strongly rejected Jewish ideas like monotheism and communism, for example Japan.

This is why pornography was unknown in Christian countries of old where only handful of Jews lived, for example 18th century France and Britain.

There was not an enormous amount of pornography in France and England as of the 18th century, even allowing for their lesser communications tech. There was a broad consensus that it was bad and should be suppressed. I say 'much less' not 'none'. Jews didn't invent prostitution, homosexuality or vice. At no point did I say that.

England has a rich history of state bans on pornography, here's some of it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscene_Publications_Act_1857

France in the 18th century was a hotbed of censorship. They chucked de Sade in prison 32 times and he was a nobleman!

The Romans had the office of censor, ranked higher even than dictators. He was supposed to uphold public morality, ensure that there men and women were marrying, crack down on crassness like theatre actors and prostitution. Now none of these states totally succeeded in limiting the publication of pornography but they made a decent attempt.

countries that strongly rejected Jewish ideas like monotheism and communism, for example Japan.

Yes, there was very little pornography in Japan before the US came along and abolished their old censorship laws. Japan was also a very fertile country, albeit diminishing due to industrialization. Then a Jewish woman came along, demanded that women's rights got added to the Japanese constitution... Fertility falls 50% in 10 years.