This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
For a certain type of person, I'm sure it is.
For me, the very thought of having to constantly police my opinions, to constantly watch out for backstabs, to worry about all the various attempts by others, even people you might trust, to exploit you and your fame for personal gain, to the point you can never really be certain if anyone authentically cares about you.
The one I think of a lot recently is Kanye West. Guy achieves true superstar status, is known for being extremely talented if a bit unhinged, billion+ dollar net worth, most projects he touches turn to gold, marries and knocks up one of the hottest women (in both the fame AND sexual attractiveness terms) on the planet, and then gets most of the above ripped away from him amidst mental breakdowns and abandonment by most of his 'friends' leaving him to various parasitic hangers-on who are desperate to grab their own strip of fame at his expense. All taking place very much in the public eye.
Let us just say I would not switch places with Kanye if given the choice.
Or the entire story of Michael Jackson, ye Gods.
I don't think I'd be comfortable having a life that is examined 24/7 by both rapid fans and haters and having to thus constantly be in 'performance' mode. The money would be great yet I wouldn't feel truly 'free' to spend it. In that sense, my role models are those types who achieve 'quiet' wealth. Like making tens of millions inventing some software that gets adopted as standard in some sub-industry that nobody ever things about, and owning a large, reclusive property somewhere in the mountains where nobody COULD bother you even if they wanted to.
Also if you're a singer, the thought of having to tour around the world is cool, but then realize that you have to perform (and practice!) the exact same songs dozens of times, likely thousands of times over the course of a career. For a born performer this might sound okay, but to me it sounds like a slow journey to insanity.
Money for Nothing and Your Chicks for Free.
I'd guess this depends on how you 'came up.' I get the sense that the so-called "Nepo babies" have it comparatively easy since your parents' connections can pave the road for you or, as the case may be, soften the landing if you fall.
I'd also guess that for those without existing connections, the number of 'gatekeepers' has proliferated making it way harder to advance to real fame. Maybe you don't have to sleep with a producer anymore (?) but you've got to get approved by a whole lot of intermediaries before you come anywhere near a big IP or studio that might actually push you through to the mainstream.
More options
Context Copy link