Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 102
- 5
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Terminator: Genisys was the monkey paw version of that film, and at its release was by far the worst Terminator film, by a very large margin. And Terminator 3 wasn't even particularly good. I don't know if that's changed now with Dark Fate, since I didn't watch that one.
Personally, I think the Terminator franchise ought to remain as is, rather than exploring the origin and takeover of Skynet. The original film was a slasher horror film with the AI takeover time travel premise as almost just a framing device, and the 2nd film was almost a remake of the 1st film in that same basic structure. They succeeded because the execution of the horror and action scenes were incredibly good, and the emotional plot and character arcs were good as well. The scifi premise wasn't there to be taken seriously or explored in depth.
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles was an excellent in-depth look at the immanence of SAGI takeover. The protagonists were scared shitless about SAGI foom not because the particular SAGI was military in origin, but because any SAGI who foomed could become Skynet with the right access.
Dark Fate was a delight to me because it showed that Skynet wasn’t the only threat; in a universe where time travel is possible, any anti-human super artificial general intelligence just needs enough forward time to figure out how to gain backward time.
More options
Context Copy link
Yes. But also you could read some point about stable time loops and their inevitability once they start. That's by accident deeper than what was probably intended.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link