Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 102
- 5
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I started listening to the audiobook of Robert Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress this past week. It wasn't some conscious choice, just a novel I'd heard a lot about and had bought on my Audible account a couple years ago which I happened to notice after I had finished my previous audiobook (Dark Harvest by Will Jordan, who is perhaps more famous by is YouTube persona The Critical Drinker - after listening to it, despite the author being an excellent critic of fiction, I don't think he's a particularly good creator of it), and I was surprised to learn that starting on chapter 1, an AI program that manages logistics on the Moon was a major plot point/character. It plays a practical joke before the events of the book by giving some janitor something like a trillion dollars more on his paycheck than normal, which causes the protagonist to be contracted to fix it, leading to them forming a sort of relationship, which includes discussions about humor and jokes and the AI's ability to understand humor. I found it interesting that the AI was depicted as actually having some competence in understanding humor, not too far from that of a typical human and perhaps even to the level of a socially inept human, in contrast to how I'd normally see AI depicted in 20th century media, lacking emotion for the sake of pure logic. It's not too far off from the kind of humor I've seen ChatGPT4 generate, indicating it still undershot how good an AI would be at this kind of conversation by the time we're using one to manage infrastructure.
The one joke that I heard the AI actually make up is "Why is a laser beam like a goldfish? Because neither one can whistle." When I asked ChatGPT to come up with a punchline for the same joke, it said "Because they both have great aim but a short memory!" which isn't any funnier, but gets a bit more at what a punchline should look like.
There were other parts in the 1st few chapters that reminded me a lot of stuff often discussed on The Motte/SSC. There's also talks of labor movements and violent suppression of such, along with multi-generational polyamorous marriages (the protagonist literally calls one of his wives "mom," and their conversations are far more similar to that of a worrying mother and son than a wife and husband), and an out-and-out rape joke told by a woman sarcastically claiming the protagonist raped her to a third party, which is purely played for laughs. It's often fascinating seeing scifi works from the past after the march of progress has worn away at that "fi" portion, and this one is definitely no exception.
I recall a commenter on the old SSC site doing reviews of all Heinlein's juveniles. His social perspective shines through, even in children's fiction, though it hadn't developed into the hardline anticommunist stance which would color his legacy. All in all, even if I wouldn't want to read them as an adult, I was reasonably impressed.
I do love reading older fiction. When I got to Michael Moorcock's Elric stories, I was amazed 1) at how much had become cliché by merit of influencing later heroic fantasy, 2) what passed for overwhelming angst. They were good reads, unapologetically schlocky, but vivid and stylized.
As a complete aside, I read Friday a while back, which was more in line with Moon or Starship Troopers. It also featured uncomfortable rape-as-humor. Specifically, the protagonist is an android, highly skilled in combat and infiltration, but able to pass in every way as a human female. Captured by enemy soldiers, she is interrogated and then gang-raped. Fortunately, being an android grants immunity to any potential consequences, including psychological trauma. So she intentionally pretends that she is starting to enjoy it, noting that this is the most reliable way to spoil their fun. Yech.
I reread most of the Heinlein juveniles with one of my kids. They weren't all winners, but I think on average they hold up better than most of his adult novels (Moon being a clear exception, along with Stranger in a Strange Land and Job, as well as the IMHO "in-between" Starship Troopers and Double Star). Citizen of the Galaxy would have been worth re-reading even for an adult. Friday, not so much. She wasn't even a mechanical android, was she? ISTR genetically-engineered.
You’re right. I’d forgotten on account of all the times she hides information in her body.
On a different note,
What a mission statement.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link