Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 78
- 3
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Ok so what can’t GPT-4 do at this point?
It still hallucinates a lot.
It is possible to get to to do useful things but the constraints are largely the same as for GPT-3.5 even if the output is a bit more polished.
More options
Context Copy link
Very surprised to find that no LLM I've tried, including GPT-4, has been able to zero-shot "Which aircraft carriers were afloat in the Pacific on June 10th 1942?"
They almost always list the carriers lost at Midway, even as half the time they note that they were sunk on June 4th/5th/7th as part of answering.
More options
Context Copy link
Avoid trying to confidently redefine basic math?
More options
Context Copy link
Kill all humans.
More options
Context Copy link
From what I've tested:
it does better with Finnish history questions I asked here from GPT 3.5, but still made at least one obvious error with 3/4 of the questions asked, and hallucinated even more stuff about Veikko Vennamo than 3.5.
it cannot translate into Finnish as well as a dedicated program like DeepL. I've only tried one text, but my estimate would be that it's output is similar to 3.5, ie. there are obvious grammatical mistakes and like.
it cannot create palindromes or Finnish-language spoonerisms. (edit: it's notso-hotso with English-language spoonerisms, either)
it struggles in writing a credible fictional alternative history timeline. I tried asking for a Confederacy-wins scenario, and its proposed point of divergence was Lee winning at Appomattox Court House.
More options
Context Copy link
Design and train GPT-5.
The OpenAI team use it internally, so it can't do it by itself but at least it can help!
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link