This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'll echo my learned friend in argument @f3zinker and say this is the real test. I do think over time patterns can be observed in who I have chemistry with and who I don't, but it's there or it's not. If you gave me a woman who met a bunch of objective standards I'm about to give, but the chemistry wasn't there for a reason I didn't articulate, marrying her would be a bad idea, because I've had the real thing and if it showed up after I married an "ok" woman without it, that's the kind of thing that ruins lives. I'm glad I didn't find that out the hard way.
My physical type is pretty eyes and waist:hip silhouette. The rest I can pretty much work around, historically speaking. I'll find things I like about her face, her weight, her skin color, her hair, her cup size, her height; if she has gorgeous eyes and she's shaped like a woman I'm pretty much there. I find no observable pattern on any of those other factors with past partners.*
After a party, is she the type of person who helps clean up before she leaves? This can be a house party, a political fundraiser at a fire hall, Thanksgiving with my family, a weekend at a friend's beach house; when I look at the girls I esteem and feel I could have committed to that is the number one shared trait. They were all the kind of girl who helps clean up when we're done. Whether out of native instinctive altruism, or merely out of familial/religious training in the idea of duty and help.
How does she understand things? Not what does she believe, that doesn't matter, but how did she come to believe it and why does she believe it? I can deal with anyone if our underlying epistemology is similar, but I can't get along with anyone if they believe things simply because they were told so, or because it benefits their "tribe." I need someone with intellectual curiosity and the ability to change their beliefs a little. Though I suspect this is an artifact of my personality, in that anyone who didn't share this with me would find me very tiresome, and girls who like me are going to be more attractive when they're with me, while women who are hidebound or take things too seriously will not be.
Have you always wanted to date a 5'11"** model of a Ken Doll that got ahold of Frosty the Snow-Man's hat and came to life? Do you want a man who will send you highlighted passages from The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans to illustrate his thoughts on your relationship? Do you want to walk the dog and hear my hot takes on how America never should have given Mexico back after the Mexican American war? Do you value that your parents will fucking love me and say I'm "such a nice boy" regardless of their own beliefs or background?*** Are you ok with the fact that I'm going to make satisfactory money, but probably less money than I strictly speaking could make if I were more ambitious about getting ahead at work? Do you need someone emotionally stable, almost pathologically incapable of overreacting to things going on around him, to balance out your own insecurities and neuroses? Do you want someone that will always listen to you, but will normally give you off-the-wall opinions about your problems? Also, I've been told that the fact I know how to use laundry bags is pretty lit.
Well, do I have a deal for you! Some as-is, but in pretty good condition! Unfortunately, been under contract for a long time, and no signs of coming on the market.
I think my wife and I both got a great deal, which is sort of the definition of a good match in my mind.
*As an aside, I think having low or absent standards has contributed to success with more "objectively" attractive women, like my wife, because I don't overly value how hot she is, where other men did.
**I've dated girls up to 6'1", no problem; being shorter than me is not a standard I have, as long as they are ok being submissive to a slightly shorter man.
***Honestly, if you don't believe in white privilege and eurocentric beauty standards, you haven't been where I've been meeting parents of virtually every race and being universally approved as 100% marriage material. Pakistani muslim immigrants, Black power leaning Babtists, Singaporean bankers, and of course any variety of white Catholic; your mama is going to love me. High SATs, saying "ma'am", and blue eyes are pretty much the master key to any mother's heart when her daughter brings you home.
More options
Context Copy link