This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'm pretty confident that the left is also a collection of interest groups. We're just in closest proximity to the Extremely Online segment. The Internet makes it easy to claim membership in half a dozen issues at once, but the people who take one seriously are way less likely to get along with the others.
To clarify, are you talking about interest groups like non-whites, non-straights, non-cis, etc.? All of these groups don't necessarily disagree in the way that hydroacetylene is arguing. That is to say, I'm not aware of black progressives claiming that homophobia isn't a problem, or that there is even one specific root problem in the country - they seem to argue that there are as many problems as there are bigotries.
In contrast, a modern atheistic alt-righter is not going to agree at all with a religious conservative on the problem facing society, though they may just strategically delay that fight.
I think this is a difference between the modern left and right: right-wingers, at least in America, seem somewhat more likely to be single-issue wonks (hence the disparate coalition that has been the GOP, between business libertarians, evangelicals, and nationalists); left-wingers tend to glom onto multiple causes at once, only favoring one thing over others when the zeitgeist calls for it.
More options
Context Copy link
No, I mean anti-racists, feminists, communards, gender abolitionists, tone police, et cetera. It’s way easier to add a bunch of hashtags on a tweet than it is to show up to rallies for competing causes.
The relationship between LGBT advocates and Black advocates might be a good example. Black Americans are not particularly trans-friendly. Intersectionality attempts to paper over this with discussion of how poorly the Black LGBT population is treated, skirting the question of who perpetuates such treatment.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link