This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Eh. Death threats is definitely something far-right and neo-nazi groups have a history of doing, and you can sort of see why. Even if in reality the threats are empty, they can be quite troubling to the victim without the perpetrator having to do much or put themselves at much risk.
No it won't. 99.9% of people have no idea this happened and never will. It hasn't just dropped out of the news cycle, it never entered it. It only seems to have appeared in a few online pieces (like the MailOnline which churns out quickly put together stories basically constantly), and while there is a short BBC article if you want to find it you have to navigate to the UK page, then go to local news, look up London, and even then it appears very far down alongside such top news as 'foam pool appears near HS2 works'.
Online? Sure. Personally nailing printed out threats to someone's door? I don't remember many such cases - and given that each of them gets a lot of publicity - if there would be a lot of it, I think I'd notice.
Oh I did mean in real life; there was a C4 Dispatches documentary about Combat 18 from a while ago and they frequently sent threats (usually phone messages but close enough, and in some cases it was written) quite similar to this.
Phone messages is online before there was online. Anybody can leave a phone message from their basement, it's very low effort. When I was very young and very stupid, we did some phone pranks. It's literally the easiest thing ever. Sending anonymous letters is more effort, but not by much (that's how they did it before everybody had telephones, I imagine). Printing this out and travelling to somebody's home to nail it at their door is significantly more effort.
Yeah but it's a bit different to online because it's harder to get hold of a random person's phone number (these were ordinary people, one was a holocaust survivor who gave a talk at a local school). And some were in person also.
No, it really isn't.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Oh, not on the main circuit news. But in all those NGO reports, that the governments spend my tax dollars on producing. Virtually nobody scrutinizes their source data, but when they produce their results - like "256% growth of death threats from far-right against people of color!" - this will be on the main circuit news, and on the table of every politician (and every main circuit journalist would ask the politician about why they haven't fixed it yet). And unless you're willing to spend insane amount of time digging in - while, unlike the NGOs, not being paid by the tax money - you will have no ways to prove it's not the case. Even if you dig it up, what would you say? "I found one report that maybe aren't right wing extremists"? Who'd listen to you?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link