site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   29600 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 6, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Given the current controversy over the game Hogwarts Legacy because of J.K. Rowling and trans issues, that thing that never happens just happened again. Even better, and to show that reality is indeed stranger than fiction, there's a J.K. Rowling connection:

A 53-year-old crossdressing butcher has been arrested in connection with the disappearance of an 11-year-old girl in the Galashiels area of Scotland.

...Earlier today, Police Scotland announced the child had been found safe and uninjured after having been missing for approximately 27 hours. She has since been reunited with her family. Police have cordoned off the property where she was found in Montgomerie Terrace in the village of Gattonside, and announced they had arrested a man in connection with the girl’s disappearance.

Local sources have named the individual arrested as Andrew Miller, a local butcher. One anonymous source from the community passed on to Reduxx that Miller was known in the area as a “crossdresser.”

Miller is the owner of Miller Butchers of Melrose, a poorly-rated meat shop which recently shut down. The shop, however, was briefly mentioned in a JK Rowling crime novel published under her pen name “Robert Galbraith.” Miller Butchers of Melrose briefly displayed the short excerpt from Career of Evil in the shop’s window, along with a framed photo of Rowling. It is unknown when the display was removed.

I have no idea if there will be another attempt to "No True Scotsman" this person as "not really trans" (and believe me, the irony that all this is happening in Scotland is not lost on me) particularly since it involves a missing child - an eleven year old girl - but if we are to blame "predatory men" who are not really trans, then how do we distinguish the "really trans" people, given that the origin stories are so similar? Whether or not the rapist 'Isla Bryson' is really trans or just pretending, he (if that is the correct term) seems to have learned off the correct origin story to tell: knew he was trans since he was four, never had the confidence to transition until in his late twenties, all the rest of it.

This new case of Andrew Miller/Amy George, who seems to have operated online identities as both male and female, can't be tidied away under the carpet because okay, he came out late in life - like other trans people. If "you're trans if you say you're trans" is the approach recommended, then how do we distinguish "okay, this person claiming to be trans is just faking it", especially since (as I have said before) years back we were told "no guy is ever going to pretend to be a woman in order just to get into women's spaces, it's too costly".

Looks like some guys are indeed pretending, unless this is just a lurid tabloid story:

Campaigners have called into question the Scottish Prison Service's (SPS) policy of allowing male prisoners to "self-id" as women in order to be put into a female-only prison.

Their concern has come after new research suggested that men who changed their gender to female in jail are switching back to their birth gender after release.

A study, published in the British Journal of Criminology, also revealed that some of these prisoners may only have identified as women in order to have sex with female inmates.

If you read the study it's somewhat more complicated and complex than that, but certainly some women prisoners have had bad experiences with transgender prisoners.

What's my point? I don't know if I have one; certainly my position on transgender rights/activism has hardened a lot, given the go-to accusations of being a TERF if you have the slightest qualms about putting male-bodied people into spaces with female-bodied people; the crying about 'medical gatekeeping' which did sound reasonable because of the way earlier psychiatrists did place demands on transgender patients but, with cases like the above, is now sounding more and more like a demand that cannot and should not be met that there should be no medical certification or barrier to getting puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery; and the exaggerations about 'literally killing me and my friends' and trans genocide

At this point it's less that the game is transphobic, cause really it's not the key issue. The creator is, and funding her campaign of genocide is wrong. However the game itself is full of antisemitic tropes and slavery apologia, which is what people should be concerned about.

I've heard of "systemic racism", is "systemic genocide" a thing now? "No we don't mean Rowling is literally building death camps and rounding up trans people to put them in those places, but she is guilty of wrongthink which is the same thing in essence"?

Whatever good will ordinary people had, I think extreme cases like this, which should never have been entertained but were in order to pander to loud screeching activists with accommodations and humouring them, are burning it all up, and the ordinary trans person who isn't a sex offender or a fetishist is going to be lumped in with these types and life will be harder than it needs to be for them.

I'm pretty sure this guy was a Fullmetal Alchemist character

Okay, but what’s that got to do with the price of tea in china?

The OP isn’t arguing it “never happens,” nor is he pointing out exploits or corner cases. He’s not connecting it to JKR or genocide or basically anything that you wrote about. And it wouldn’t make sense if he did, because Blanchard et al. never really come into those discussions!

I feel like you’re looking for a place to drop a rant about the latest atrocity. I don’t feel like it makes sense down here. Just do a top-level.

Okay, but what’s that got to do with the price of tea in china?

Are these two examples "real" transgender women or not?

If not, why not?

If they're men acting as/pretending to be women, why?

Is Blanchard/Bailey typography correct and some people do get sexual gratification out of 'becoming' women, and is that what is happening in these cases?

Because we're left with the sticky problem of "what is transgender anyway, what does it mean to 'feel like a woman', and if you do away with 'medical gatekeeping' how do you distinguish genuine transgender from pretence, fetish, or some other disorder?"

Where is the line dividing "living the part so long you come to believe it's true" versus "kids as young as two can know for sure they're trans"?

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats