Merry Christmas, everyone!
Small-Scale Question Sunday for December 25, 2022
- 163
- 4
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
24/25, barely made it. It seems like it is very culturally dependent, though I have a hard time imagining anyone born in the USA scoring 10/25.
I got a bit annoyed at
which I ended up spending over a minute on (and still got wrong, though found the answer online).
Agree on both (had trouble with the America-centric questions, or with terminology I hadn’t seen before), yet that’s what’s being advertised - 20/50 is supposed to be roughly IQ = 100, and apparently there was a published thing in the 1980s which showed average scores for NFL players by position (ranging from 16 to 26). Other sites show averages for other professions, though unsourced; apparently nurses average 23 and chemists 31?
Just seems very low to me.
With 4 multiple choice answers, the expected result from random guessing would be 12.5. Get 10 answers right, randomly guess on the rest, and you're average.
I figure the time constraint is what kills people's points, but if you know that will be the limiting factor up front, you could just say make sure you stick to 10 seconds per question, guess on ones you don't know, and... almost certainly get above average? It's quite easy to game.
Alternatively, maybe these questions are easier than the actual test, or the knowledge it's testing is more widely known today than it was originally.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Scores of 10 or below in the wonderlic test are counted as ‘functionally illiterate’ rather than ‘low IQ’ for that reason.
This was the 25-question short version though, so I'd expect 10/25 to very roughly correspond to 20/50, with a significantly increased measurement error. 20/50 is supposed to be average.
Also crazy: the entire Jordan v. New London case was because a police department automatically rejected people for getting 28/50 or higher because they were too smart.
Ah, my mistake there then.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link