site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   4130 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for December 9, 2022

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

3
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What do you call that annoying thing where a work that self-consciously sets out to puncture that narrative of one historical figure/group goes on to quite obviously parrot the self-serving tripe of another historical figure/group? It's a sort of in-work Gell Mann Amnesia or dissonance, where an author seems to forget that the whole point of his work was to tell us the real dope, the inside story. Or like leveraging oneself so thoroughly against one figure that one ends up taking another figure's bullshit at face value. I feel like I'm not expressing my point well, so I'll give some examples.

-- In Robert Caro's monumental biographies, he often punctures legends of both Robert Moses and Lyndon Johnson. "Johnson often said he was a wandering farm laborer in California, but really he was angling to become a lawyer while practicing law without a license at 19 years old." That sort of thing. But then Caro will give us a quick biography of another figure, Sam Rayburn or Al Smith, and repeat absolute whoppers that they told about their lives. The "Walked fifteen miles uphill both ways to school" stuff, the "never even let a lobbyist buy him lunch" stuff.

-- In the latest season of The Crown, which goes to great lengths to reveal the inner scandals of the Royal family and paint them as absurd and self-centered, they introduced Mohammed and Dodi Fayed. When Dodi is born, his father holds him and gives the kind of soliloquy that no one has ever given in real life, but that an egotist or his biographer would claim to have given at a key moment. The speech is like something Thucydides or Plutarch would put into someone's mouth.

-- Revisionist historians who, in their quest to puncture American mythology, take the Soviets or the Nazis propaganda at face value.

Is Robert Caro where the "walked fiften miles uphill both ways through snow" thing came from?

The whole chapters on Rayburn that I'm reading right now in "the path to power." It's all stories right from Rayburn about his youth on the farm, giving speeches in barns to cows. As greyenlightenment pointed out "the power broker" is hella long so I don't want to rely on memory too hard, but I recall the sections on Al Smith and to a lesser extent la Guardia being much friendlier than the coverage of Moses.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats