This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Tiktok is owned by Bytedance.
From Bytedance' wikpedia page:
https://www.scmp.com/tech/big-tech/article/3145362/chinese-government-takes-minority-stake-board-seat-tiktok-owner
You may be missing how "the company" and "the chinese government" are pretty aligned on the issue regardless. They wouldn't do it 'on their own' except they're doing it and one should probably not ignore the incentives at play here.
Was that meant to be surprising? The chinese govt is deeply personally tied to, and exerts direct guiding power over, its economy in a way the US govt isn't.
That doesn't mean chinese tech companies aren't trying to make profit, grow, or get user attention, or that they aren't trying to get users otherwise. These limits exist, and their recent creation is newsworthy because before them, tiktok and other apps were showing 'unwholesome' content to underage users, and letting them use the app as much as they wanted to. And not by corrupting intent, but because that is what got the most views.
Aligned in the sense of taking action, yes. To a lesser extent, but similarly - tech companies in europe are aligned with the GDPR, and Apple is aligned with the chinese government in China. But absent the guiding hand of the government, they'd be happy to let people use their product more.
OP claimed "Well. The choice of algorithm is probably intentional." - as if TikTok being attention-grabby in the US was intentional by china to harm the US somehow, compared to a tiktok wholesome algorithm in the US. This is very incoherent, and very common, something I've had irl friends and internet friends tell me dozens of times total. Aside from US companies using the same algorithms, and surfacing almost identical content for adults, and OP being about content presented to adults in the US, while douyin produces similarly cute girl / stupid content for adults in China, douyin was less-filtered for chinese youth years ago before those changes were implemented! The desire to claim China is Hurting Us without much justification seems prevalent - similar are "tiktok is a chinese privacy violation operation we must ban it" - much of US social media is already public and china can get most of what it gets via owning TikTok just by scraping twitter, facebook, instagram, etc, just as you yourself can. (the only place I've seen that statement made is, funnily, a CSET report)
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link