site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 14, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

6
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There are a number of both ideological and state actors that could be responsible for the attack: the Israeli Mossad, the Ukrainian SBU, the American Central Intelligence Agency, any number of Democratic Party functionaries. But at this time the provenance of the attack is unknown, and no one has taken credit.

From what I understand, the hack that took down 4chan (a 10 year old security vulnerability in what files they allowed people to upload) was way too stupid to have been a state actor. By which I mean, it would have been effortless for a state actor to have taken 4chan down at any point. There is no reason for them to do it now. So instead I'm more willing to chalk it up to random belligerence.

If details of what the hack revealed are remotely true, it seems like 4chan was co opted by state actors anyways. Lots of moderation and bans nipping at the edges of "noticing". Lots of .gov and .edu addresses on record. There is a sense that there were forces trying to sheep herd 4chan gently closer to The Message.

Adding on to @grognard’s comment below, I recall hearing that the misconception of jannies having .gov emails came from a mocking tweet saying that a number of them had signed up with their “gov names [as in real names] and .edu emails”, which was misunderstood as “.gov and .edu emails”. Then, as the internet is wont to do, this more salacious rumor spread faster than the truth.

No. There are no .gov addresses. There are a few .edu, but not from any particularly connected institution AFAICT. I can DM you the dump list, but it is publicly available. Most addresses are Gmail and even Outlook, with a smattering of ProtonMail.