site banner

Scott: Come On, Obviously The Purpose Of A System Is Not What It Does

astralcodexten.com

This made me reflect that I hadn't actually thought critically about the phrase (at least, commensurate to how often it's used). For fun, if you think the purpose of a system is what it does, write what you think that means, before reading Scott's critique, then write if you've updated your opinion. For example: I think it's a useful way of re-framing obviously dysfunctional systems, so as to analyze their dysfunction, but Scott is persuasive that it's not a good means of understanding systems, in general, so people should be more cautious about adopting this framing and using the phrase, rhetorically.

(Spoilers go between two sets of "||")

12
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Leonard Nimoy narrating the technological research in Civilization IV is etched into my brain.

The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.

Warn a brother before dropping a nostalgia bomb that big.

Wait, nostalgia? Is your inner monologue not composed of at least 20% Leonard Nimoy Civ IV quotes?

"I got pig iron, I got pig iron, I got ALL pig iron" pops up occasionally despite making no sense in almost any context.