This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Public statements of support for organizations (including bad ones) are protected by the First Amendment. I can't see how this would survive a constitutional challenge unless he did something more substantial than "express support" for Hamas.
Well, not absolutely protected in all possible cases.
Someone who publicly expresses support for a foreign adversary can, for example, be denied employment with certain government agencies or denied a security clearance, or discharged from the military, or possibly imprisoned to the extent there's reason to think they've committed espionage or similar acts.
Similarly, it seems likely that Congress can prohibit Federal Funds from being spent on types of speech that are protected but that Congress doesn't want to subsidize. I.e. you can't compel the government to give you funding to spread your speech, nor can you force them to give you funding that they've withdrawn because of some specific speech you engaged in, provided they are doing so within the bounds of a given program they've established.
Seems likely, for instance, that if you started up an otherwise accredited college called "The Death to America School for Anti-United States Activities" that offered courses on "Undermining the Federal Government" and "Foreign Espionage 101" as part of a degree program in "Domestic Subversion Studies" that you couldn't complain if the government denied federal grants to your school or refused access to Federally-backed loans to you due to the particular type of speech you were engaged in.
There's probably a fight to be had over whether somebody here on a visa or as a permanent resident can have their status revoked for what is implicitly an 'Anti-American' position.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link