This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'm not claiming the current situation is a 1:1 copy of the interwar period, just that the Czechoslovakian potential helped in later Hitler's military conquest (including several Slovakian divisions being used in 1939 invasion of Poland). I'm not going to defend the Poland's dick (and short-sighted) move of grabbing Trans-Olza from Czechoslovakia, either. It is worth pointing out, though, that Poland's help to Czechoslovakia was a complete fiction back then because Poland and Czechoslovakia were not too friendly, mainly due to a similarly dick Czechoslovakian move of invading Trans-Olza in 1919 while Poland was preoccupied in defending their eastern borders.
A couple of things.
Don't you think that it's rather far-fetched to claim that Poland was "defending" her "eastern borders" in January 1919? From whom? The newly formed Ukrainian state that was claiming her independence at roughly the same time as Poland? Also, what "eastern borders" did Poland have? East ot Poland a civil war was raging, and the bolshevik regime was fighting for survival, not attacking Poland.
Slovakia's actions after 1939 don't fit into your parallel at all. Nothing of this sort did happen or is ever going to happen in Ukraine. (You're not going to claim that Slovakian independence was illegitimate, are you?.) Regarding military potential, it's true that the Germans captured enough equipment to equip roughly 45 divisions, plus large armaments industry facilities intact. Again, this is something that's never going to happen in Ukraine at all. To spell it out: the area that remains under the control of the Ukrainian government never had and does not have an armaments industry comparable in scale at all (to spell ot out further, look at size of the Czechoslovak armaments sector as compared to the German in 1938, and that of the Ukrainian as compared to the Russian today), and even if it did, there's no chance of the Russians ever capturing it intact ever.
No matter what went down in 1919, in 1938 Poland should have assisted Czechoslovakia against Germany even out of nothing else but self-interest. It was well known by that time that Hitler wanted to undo the Versailles Treaty, consequently to regain lands that were surrendered to a newly formed Poland, especially Danzig. It logically followed that if the Sudeten crisis ends with concessions made to the Germans, they'll be emboldended and make similar demands to Poland. It was evident. France and Britain were not in a geographical position to assist Czechoslovakia in a defensive war, but Poland was.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link