The Wednesday Wellness threads are meant to encourage users to ask for and provide advice and motivation to improve their lives. It isn't intended as a 'containment thread' and any content which could go here could instead be posted in its own thread. You could post:
-
Requests for advice and / or encouragement. On basically any topic and for any scale of problem.
-
Updates to let us know how you are doing. This provides valuable feedback on past advice / encouragement and will hopefully make people feel a little more motivated to follow through. If you want to be reminded to post your update, see the post titled 'update reminders', below.
-
Advice. This can be in response to a request for advice or just something that you think could be generally useful for many people here.
-
Encouragement. Probably best directed at specific users, but if you feel like just encouraging people in general I don't think anyone is going to object. I don't think I really need to say this, but just to be clear; encouragement should have a generally positive tone and not shame people (if people feel that shame might be an effective tool for motivating people, please discuss this so we can form a group consensus on how to use it rather than just trying it).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
At 40 I would look at your 30 year risk. It takes decades for heart disease to develop and by the time it shows up in a calcium score, statins can only do so much to help.
Calcium scores also have a fairly difficult to disregard high false negative rate IMO.
If I were you I would push my doctor to prescribe me statins. They're low risk and practically free.
High cholesterol is very easily treated and could be hidden bad news.
(I'm not a real doctor btw)
I do find it odd that they use a 10 year calculator not a 30 year one.
Any more idea why they do that? Lack of data?
According to ChatGPT about 20-30% of people will have a non zero score by my age. Assuming that’s accurate (will need to verify) it does seem to indicate I am not at high risk. Why not just wait and monitor?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link