This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
You said he should be taking the win, and that TW has nothing to do with the issues he cares about. You can't tell me he had nothing to do with it, if he was endorsing a candidate that would, at best, not provide the win (but given the performance of the Biden administration, she'd most likely pull as far from the win as possible).
The "brutal" denunciation of Harris literally does not matter when you're telling people to vote for her.
It seems to me that support for a candidate can be more nuanced than either 100 or 0. If you're a right-wing Trump voter, a centrist Democrat like TW is clearly closer to you on many issues than a far-left socialist. Singling out the people who are most likely to listen to you or support you on some issues seems unproductive to me. In all ways other than the simple vote, which can only express one end of a binary, TW is working to drag the Democrats as far towards the centre as possible. I'd say the most productive thing to do is take Trump's win and try to use it as an opportunity to attract swayable centrists and increase the strength of the coalition.
It's more than the vote itself, he can vote however he wants, it's the endorsement that's the rub. Like he said in the very tweet you linked to:
He thinks his voice can have some impact on the election, and he's using it to get people to vote for Harris. You can't then turn around and tell me that he has nothing to do with the wins Trump provided, and Harris would work against.
I've had many conversations with Trace over the years, and for the majority of the time I thought we were having a reasonable conversation, but lately I don't get the feeling he's all that likely to listen to me at all, let alone support me.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link