This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Because, and like the last time the Americans went to war against Germany (you say "allies" and "axis", but let's be real here) and won single-handedly, the Germans were completely exhausted while the Americans were mostly fresh. It turns out that a campaign of island hopping doesn't really require a massive army to wage, and highly mechanized forces like navies and air forces don't exhaust a population's will or ability to fight in the same way.
Remember that Germany, America, and Japan were three of the four newest nations on the planet at the time, and with youth brings vigor and innovation.
(They all began three generations- 70 years- before going to war with each other: Germans would defeat France and transition from a confederacy to a federation in 1871, America would conclusively defeat its confederacy faction in 1865, and Japan would unify its confederate states in 1868. The Soviet Union is the other one, formed in 1917, where House Romanov was defeated by House Stalin. It's not so much the age of the country so much as it is the age of that country's elite- when a large amount of it is defeated it creates living space for newer special interests- and while that won't protect you from going to war and losing, which the French [a 70 year old country themselves at the time] did in 1871, it does put you in a position to be reasonably able to contest with weaker, more sclerotic countries for dominance.)
More options
Context Copy link