This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
In what world would Saudi Arabia, or any other country, agree to this? Israel already tried to give Gaza to the Egyptians, and they didn't want it. Gaza is nothing more than a headache for any country with the misfortune of having sovereignty over them. Hell, Saudi Arabia doesn't even have any formal relations with Israel and doesn't recognize them, yet Israel is supposed to grant their military unlimited transit across their territory? Not to mention that Jordan would have to agree to this as well.
The world where Saudi Arabia isn't Egypt and the Arab League has had something like this proposal, known as the Arab Peace Initiative, for nearly two decades which offers totally normalized relations in exchange for the end of the occupation and a Palestinian state and has also been endorsed by Iran and Hezbollah. So, this world which we live in right now.
Is this speculated predicted deal the same as that? No, there are some differences. Is this deal likely? No, it's a prediction based on a difficult conditional.
Saudi Arabia and the Arab League isn't Egypt. One is stable and filthy rich and the other is teetering on collapse. Jordan will do what the US demands and so will Israel if someone who is seen as a rabid Zionist actually forces them to face consequences if they don't.
None of those initiatives offered a clear sovereign to rule over the Palestinian State and ensure that its territory is not used to launch attacks.
That's the missing piece. The (esp Arab) world does not want Israel to be that entity. But they don't want to step up and do it themselves. So all that's left is to periodically mow the grass.
Right, which is why Trump announced the US was going to do it themselves then to pressure the Arabs; do the Arabs want the US to administer it or would they prefer to do it themselves?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link