site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 3, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The only real reason to think that DOGE wasn't meant seriously was the name. DOGE as a thing made perfect sense as something he'd do. And the name isn't going to affect what it actually does, and this isn't a GIMP situation where people really have a choice to stay away because of the name, so the name is just there to thumb his nose at the media.

The reason not to take DOGE seriously was the Musk was saying all the normal things that people who are not serious about spending cuts say, including starting with foreign aid, using headcount reductions as a proxy for spending reductions, talking about waste/fraud/abuse without specifics, and insisting that there is a lot more fraud in simple well-run programmes like Social Security than there actually is.

Most US federal government spending is Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, debt interest, and the military. Medicaid is mostly block-granted to the states. Social Security and debt interest are about cutting checks to people who are legally entitled to them, so levels of waste and fraud are very low. So if you are talking about cutting waste/fraud/abuse without talking about Medicare or the military, I am going to think you are a bullshitter.

I think this is missing the point. If you want to make massive cuts you need to tackle entitlements. But if you just want to bend the cost curve whilst removing growth killing regulations, you need to tackle things like what DOGE is doing.