site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 27, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

but there are some cities in Europe now where, if I go outside, I am mostly among young men who are dressed and act to signal capacity for violence, have strong ingroup bias among themselves, and communicate (often exclusively) in languages that I have little to no knowledge of.

I do not think this is true at the level of "cities" anywhere in Europe*. There are definitely neighborhoods it applies to - particularly for me in the UK as an RP speaker with no understanding of Geordie, Scouse and other similar languages spoken by violent sub-groups of the indigenous population in the chavlands, which are considerably more dangerous than the so-called "no-go zones" of Tower Hamlets.

I am told that there is a small number of cities in the United States where this phenomenon is true across most of the city - again due to a violent subgroup of the indigenous population that speaks a barely-intercomprehensible dialect. And yes I am talking about Ebonics.

* Malmo is the most Islamised city in Europe, and is roughly 1/3 Muslim, and (separately - there are Swedish-born Muslims and non-Muslim immigrants) 2/3 Swedish-born. I am prepared to defer to anyone who has actually spent more than a few days there as to whether this is enough that a majority of neighbourhoods fit 4bpp's criterion.

This was specifically my experience in the city center of Bochum, Germany, when I went there for a few days last year. Up until then, I also believed that German anti-immigration people were being overly dramatic or duplicitous seeing how it is not like that except in a few known problematic suburbs in other cities I had been to even recently).

Can't speak on Malmö, but keep in mind that superficial numbers like x/y Muslim only tell part of the tale. Look also at the demographic pyramid, if you want pure statistics, or just go outside and have a look. See who's actually present in the street, who speaks most loudly, who blasts their music out for everyone to hear. It's not the aged, docile native populations. And it's far from being a phenomenon confined to a handful of affected cities. Small towns and even villages in rural Germany see the same rapid development, and simply pointing at statistics does nothing to change what my lying eyes show me.