site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 27, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

RWers have spent the past several years LARPing like they were Soviet dissidents living under a regime of red terror when it turned out they actually lived in a liberal democracy that functioned as advertised the whole time.

I agree with this in sentiment. Your main point is substantively correct.

Still, there are various facts that we're learning about how the government operated that suggest on that on the sliding scale between "red terror" and "following the rules", they were at least a smidgen over the line.

For example, sure, if you press one button or another (modulo Congress, which I'm still convinced ought to step up to their role they've seemingly willingly abdicated, but that's another thread) then the government changes priorities and spend money on different things. That's well and good, but it seems like we've been granting millions in tax dollars to left-leaning groups to do left-leaning politics is not quite inside the rules. The button-pressing-winner is emphatically not supposed to be allowed to spend government dollars to convince people to press his button again in 4 years.

Does that mean it's the Soviet gulag? Absolutely not, but nuance is good here and despite the histrionics of the reactionary right, they had some nugget of truth in there.

The button-pressing-winner is emphatically not supposed to be allowed to spend government dollars to convince people to press his button again in 4 years.

I agree with, but even in countries which Americans considered at least adjacent to Liberty, and not dictatorships, the people in power can explicitly use the fact that they in power and thus have access to the fiscus, to persuade the masses of the correctness of their political views.