site banner

Wellness Wednesday for January 22, 2025

The Wednesday Wellness threads are meant to encourage users to ask for and provide advice and motivation to improve their lives. It isn't intended as a 'containment thread' and any content which could go here could instead be posted in its own thread. You could post:

  • Requests for advice and / or encouragement. On basically any topic and for any scale of problem.

  • Updates to let us know how you are doing. This provides valuable feedback on past advice / encouragement and will hopefully make people feel a little more motivated to follow through. If you want to be reminded to post your update, see the post titled 'update reminders', below.

  • Advice. This can be in response to a request for advice or just something that you think could be generally useful for many people here.

  • Encouragement. Probably best directed at specific users, but if you feel like just encouraging people in general I don't think anyone is going to object. I don't think I really need to say this, but just to be clear; encouragement should have a generally positive tone and not shame people (if people feel that shame might be an effective tool for motivating people, please discuss this so we can form a group consensus on how to use it rather than just trying it).

2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Does anyone know of any reviews or analyses of Bryan Johnson's food guide/protocol? To me a large amount of this is obviously useful (eating well, sleeping properly, exercising, etc etc) but him also selling $50 packs of blueberries and supplements infowars-style suggests me that some portion of it might be grift. I'd like to see a rating of what's useful and what's more skeptical other than from the author himself.

https://blueprint.bryanjohnson.com/pages/blueprint-protocol

Its certainly a good amount of grift and clout chasing IMO.

Many of the substances he is taking are on the cutting edge of science, as in, there are very few studies to go off of, and even fewer ones based on human models, in vivo or in vitro.

He also has/is taking supplements with opposing mechanisms of action. For instance, in the past he was taking rapamycin (sirolimus) which is an mTOR inhibitor, but was also taking creatine, which induces mTOR...

The diet, exercise and sleep are all good choices, but from there things get quite a bit murkier. I do think at some point taking too many experimental treatments is going to backfire, metformin only improving lifespan in type 2 diabetes being another. It actually blunts adaptations to exercise, which may not impact him much while he is relatively young, but may do so more as time goes on.

Bear in mind that he is only 47 years old. We will just have to wait about 30 years when he would reach the average American male lifespan and see just how much of his claims actually pan out. I remain skeptical; something's very suss about this dude from the start.

I do find it amusing that the oldest verified person indulged in the likes of dark chocolate, port wine and cigarrettes.

There’s a pretty persuasive theory that Calment was actually her daughter impersonating her, but in either case she still lived a very long life.

It seems to me obvious that each of us have a natural life expectancy that is probably decided before and during birth and possibly to some extent in early childhood. We can reduce this by poor luck or by destroying ourselves by becoming alcoholics, drug addicts, taking unnecessary risks, being exposed to toxic substances, but we can’t increase it.

If your destiny is to die at 65 or 70 for genetic reasons there’s probably nothing you can do. If your destiny is to die at 103 then all you need to do is have some luck (not die in a war, accident, get exposed to a mountain of asbestos etc) and practice the most basic self care - like not getting ridiculously obese - and you will meet that expectancy.

Bryan Johnson's food guide/protocol?

it is found here: https://protocol.bryanjohnson.com/Step-1-Step-2-Step-3

He says he's a vegan. There is some truth to this as an effective weight loss diet. Cultures and societies that primarily subsist on starches tend to be thin. Plant based foods have lower calorie density, save for nuts. When I lost weight, I found myself adhering to mostly a non-meat diet. Animal products limited to fish and some chicken.

He is running a massive, multivariate, and esoteric experiment with an N of 1. Its not possible to say what's useful other than stuff we knew beforehand from actual studies: eat well, exercise, sleep well.

That's quite true, and the dynamics of different body systems and what we eat/how we act is obviously not a solved system, but I would be happy with individual reviews of his practices of diet and supplements even if they amount to "X: 95% agreed by all very good and helpful, Y: 70% probably good but maybe is just targeting biomarkers and not getting perceived health benefits, Z: 40%, lacking evidence of claim, cutting edge practice by Mr Johnson"

My point is that by definition 100% of his unique claims lack conclusive evidence. Individual reviews will be anecdotal in an area where people are known to fool themselves. That said, I understand the desire for individual reviews. His ideas are interesting, and may help. But there are myriad things we known for sure will help. Most people don't do them.