This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Your entire bit has just been calling everything nonsense without engaging with the material. I really hate to burst your bubble- Christianity was invented by the Jews! Likewise Islam was derived from Judaism. Paul's project was explicitly to formulate a Judaism for Gentiles, and that effort yielded another extremely influential myth that is part of this long saga.
None of this is even controversial, what's controversial is the meaning behind these myths or the intention behind them. Notably, Christianity led to iconoclasm against the idols of traditional European religion in favor of sole worship of Yahweh above all else. That's not even disputable, you are just saying it was random development of history rather than an intelligent mythological influence. Kind of like how some people genuinely think Wokeness just popped out of the ground independent of the will of the people creating Culture everywhere they look.
Myth is a mechanism for control. That's the entire point of REM Theory. This applies to the Bible, and it applies to Marvel Comics and Schindler's List all equally. It's insightful and frankly derivative of insights from Plato's allegory of the Cave or Herbert's Dune.
No what you’re doing is the bait and switch where you take something uncontroversial like Christianity came from Judaism and adding on it’s a conspiracy theory for 2,000 years to secretly control the goyim and destroy European civilization. You see how what you are doing is incredibly dishonest, right? Which of course you do, which is why you don’t come out and say it. But since I know yours and Richard’s little bit (and again I’m almost positive you are the leave the Abrahamic matrix guy which you haven’t denied) you had to admit it what you are doing.
You are delusional if you think you have any idea who somebody is just because they share something they found interesting on Substack.
You are just taking a point-and-sputter approach where you don't engage with any of the arguments. Your comment is not an accurate characterization of REM Theory, but you can't actually engage the arguments it makes so instead you set up a really easy to tackle straw man.
You don’t have an argument. You just are Gish galloping and bait and switching. You believe all those conspiracies I mentioned. I’m just saying what you believe which is that Christianity is a Jewish hoax. You are clearly Richard, Mark, Adam or someone closely associated with them coming to recruit. Do you not believe Christianity is a Jewish hoax? You’ve all but admitted it so just say what you actually think. It’s annoying that you just won’t outright say what you believe.
Christianity is no more of a hoax than the myth of Jacob and Esau, or Moses, or Jupiter. I do not call any of those a hoax, they are something more powerful than that- a Hollywood movie is not a hoax. REM is about understanding the function of myth in directing the identity and ultimately genetic evolution of groups of people. I have explained this to you but you refuse to engage that argument so I think this conversation is pretty much done.
I've followed Richard's Substack and found the thesis very compelling, why is that so hard for you to understand? Do you know what Substack is? Do you know it lets other people read your stuff? No idea why you insist I am one of those people, you are delusional.
I apologize. I was incredibly rude and did personal attacks. I really dislike Richard and took that out on you as a proxy. That being said, I still disagree but probably no point in continuing this particular argument because it has gotten off the rails, mostly due to my actions.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link