This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
If someone suggests that their opponent do, for their own good, something which straightforwardly harms them, it's probably concern trolling or motivated reasoning.
This might not be good for white nationalists (although I suspect in many cases it actually would be) but if the white nationalists are willing to put what's good for white nationalists ahead of what's good for white people then what is the good of white nationalists?
Of course you could argue that this is a principal/agent problem that exists in all political parties and...yes! And political parties (should) get punished by their constituents when they ignore their constituents' interests. To the extent that "white people" are the constituents of "white nationalists" (which in reality is very much not the case) then my argument is that they are arguably staring down the barrel of a principal/agent problem, inasmuch as (waiving objections for the sake of argument, here) to whatever extent that what identity politics ("white nationalism") was an asset for the constituents under an identity-politics regime, it has now become an increased liability under a more meritocratic regime.
More options
Context Copy link
I suppose that begs the question, do you sincerely believe in the superiority of the white man or do you not?
Because if you do, a truly colorblind meritocracy will get you 90% of what you say you want for free, as the cream naturally rises to the top. Sure the occasional woman or Negro may rise to power on thier own merits but that is hardly a insoluble problem, and arguably not really a problem at all.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link