Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?
This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.
Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Well for example today I read an article titled 'Disgusting Vaxer Cunt Dies of Heart Attack at 49'.
You may disagree with the wording of the headline but that same article taught me that not only did Julie Powell die at 49 from cardiac arrest caused by heart arrhythmia but also provided context: she was a fervent vaxxie, boosted in Dec 21 and had a black hairy tongue in late October, which her doctor found not to be a big deal (trust the experts!).
Moreover, she also tweeted what seemed to be virulent hate and did not get banned for it, until her ultimate ban to the shadow realms.
[>"I really can see the argument for slaughtering white people in the streets. It’s not going to happen, because most people are better than me, but Jesus. I see the temptation.
I’m gonna get banned, aren’t i?"](https://twitter.com/licjulie/status/1281476312528498688)
Some people may find that the headline is appropriately worded, after all.
While the article itself is very cheap, easy reporting, thanks to the modern tendency of publishing everything on Twitter; you will hardly get to read such an analysis anywhere else.
By comparison, you can read a cheap article written about crime, with the horrendous headline
'A Woman Was Murdered After Rejecting Her Co-Worker's Sexual Advances. 'We Had No Indication Anything Was Awry,' Her Boss Said.'
and potentially walk away with the idea that a white incel killed after getting turned down, while the perp is none other than Mr. 60%
There is no analysis of the dangers of mixed-race or mixed-sex workplaces, and the basic information is not even there.
While reading news is pointless, at least slurs are a shortcut compared to their leftwing version 'systemic racism', 'entrenched inequalities', 'lack of diversity', 'vulnerable BIPOC and LGBTQUP+ communities' etc etc.
And if you need a reminder that such writings are a threat to the powers-that-be, consider that once again their latest domain name was taken away at the same time as the hammer fell on Kanye.
"Some people" may indeed. Yes, dude, I get it. You are the target audience for the Dailystormer. No need to hide your power level.
Everybody is a target audience for the Dailystormer, they are inclusive with their support of people like Kanye, Tulsi Gabbard, Greenwald...
I don't generally use slurs and find them distateful, but I understand that the shocking value is a way to generate an audience.
If your media of choice includes people that advocate for baby murder, child mutilation, US empire wars etc, how is it any more respectable?
This selective outrage over language is quite classist. Reminds me of the Martha Vineyard financial backers of open borders who immediately got rid of the handfuls of immigrants sent their way by the 'distateful' Republicans.
They would never call them 'illegal aliens' but they just couldn't find a spot on their million dollar estates to house them.
Everyone knows who and what the Dailystormer is about. You are not fooling anyone.
I have more respect for white supremacists who own it and say what they believe outright than tap-dancers.
Idk if everybody does as most people don't even know how to access the website, thanks to a number of internet services blacklisting them.
It certainly is an informative website for those that care about subjects that are censored in most other media.
I don't know if DS is strictly white supremacist, but maybe according to your own definition it is?
One would think they would not praise Kanye if they were supremacists.
I only say what I believe, I'm not sure what you think I should be saying that I am not saying.
It's a safe bet everyone here on the Motte is familiar with them.
You are pretending to believe that the Daily Stormer is just another independent news outlet that happens to use shocking language sometimes and that you "don't know if they are strictly white supremacist."
I do not believe you.
I don't believe they are white supremacists, they themselves always deny being white supremacists.
white supremacist
noun
1.One who believes that white people are racially superior to others and should therefore dominate society.
2.An advocate of white supremacy, a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races.
3.a person who believes that the white race is or should be supreme
I don't see them belonging to 2. and 3.. I don't see what is wrong with 1, wanting to 'dominate society', if by that you mean 'having control of [their] society' which most people in their own country have.
I would definitely call them 'white nationalists' or 'American nationalists' but again, what is wrong with that? Why should people not want to see people like them succeed?
I definitely understand the plight of African-Americans who don't see themselves in the board rooms of major corporations or rewarded with scientific achievements awards.
Despite making up 13% of the American population, you hardly ever see them succeed at anything besides working for jewish owners in entertainment and sports.
By your definition of supremacism, I would classify all major American media as jewish supremacists. One can see that they always side with the jews over even the blacks, that they spent 2 years pretending were the most important people on Earth.
So it's good to have a little bit of diversity. Among the ardently zionist media, get a different perspective.
Having a different perspective does not make a media less respectable than any other.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link