Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 191
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Careless Whisper
On the topic of music, does anyone know of any good blogs/videos aimed at laymen that explains why current pop music sounds the way it does?
I just happened into this youtube video from Justin Hawkins (of The Darkness fame) where he goes over a research paper (I believe this one) that gives three (apparently) fairly well researched factors for at least a part of that. The factors are decreased harmonic complexity, lack of timbral variation and lack of dynamics. I'm not qualified to really comment on harmonic complexity but the lack of timbral variation and (complete) lack of dynamics are some of main reasons I listen to very litte music made after the mid 90s. It's not an accident that after that started the era of Digital Audio Workstations and ubiquituous multiband compressors & brickwall limiter use.
Wings of Pegasus has made lots of videos where he analyzes and shows by example how autotune overuse is now the norm, with even reissues from classic singers being autotuned "because that's what you're supposed to do". This definitely affects the way music sounds now.
Billy Hume tackled the question of copy pasting and quantization in modern recordings in a pretty decent video. Yet another factor that makes everything samey sounding.
I'm tempted to write a "this is why modern music sucks" post but I suspect I'd just be shouted down by people who claim it's all because "You just listen to the music that you liked in my formative years!" (plot twist: I only found the majority of the music I like nowadays when I was in my late 20s or older, when it had already been out of style for decades).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link