site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 6, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

7
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Would you count graphic novels? then I'm up there with you :)

At 50, with some perspective, I can see the heaviest reading period of my life was between 10-28 yrs. For instance, I read Atlas Shrugged twice but I was around 16 and 25 when I did so. I read Guns, Germs and Steel around 30--that's 20 years ago! So, maybe, as a Mottizen, the answer is simply that a lot of us already "did the work." We value books and have the knowledge, it's just a bit dated.

Here's another thing that happened: at some point in middle age, I realized I was just zoning out and getting through books but not absorbing much. Now when I read, I (almost literally) go over every page three time to make sure I really 'get it.' Maybe this is my brain crusting over or maybe I've become a better reader, but it definitely slows my pace. 50 pages an hour seems recklessly high to me, though I could surely do a 100 page Dog Man book in under an hour.

Also, my interest in literature has plummeted that has had a pretty big effect on the number of books I read. I read more non-fiction lately, but removing fiction (almost entirely) has put a pretty big hole in my overall time window. I suppose I replaced it with comics, but no one wants to hear that!

I watch almost no TV (5-ish hours a week of Netflix), my doom-scrolling is minimal (though I waste hours writing replies that I often end up deleting), and I spend most of my free-time recording music in my studio. As a family man, start-up, artist guy, reading is a hobby I have limited time for and don't enjoy as much as I once did.

Regardless, 89 books in a year is a lot by any measure, IMO. Go ahead an flex. Regardless of wasted time, most adults just don't have it in them to do that. Joyfully wasting a day with a book is just not a possibility. Still, I know people who haven't read a book since they graduated from college. I don't think that's actually rare and it's a damn shame. If someone told me they read a ~300 page book every month, I'd probably give them a cookie.

surely do a 100 page Dog Man book in under an hour

Depends how long you spend appreciating the pathos and moral depth of the redemption of Petey the Cat.