This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
That may be the case. Based on everything you said, it's unlikely we are going to change our moderation to suit you. Bear in mind, of course, that so far you have only been talking to me, and I can't say how many of the other mods are reading this thread. You can always ping them and try to get their feedback.
Well, the thing is, the intent is for this to be a platform where people can do that, but we never said that our purpose is to be referees and try to enforce a particular kind of discourse, beyond generally pushing back against people who try to step out of bounds. It was never meant to be a formal "debate club" with judges blowing whistles. We aren't teachers, judges, or editors. If people post shitty arguments and no one argues back, or worse, gives them upvotes and AAQCs, well, that's what the community has decided it wants, and while we will continue to enforce some norms regardless of community sentiment, we're not going to take on the role that you seem to want us to.
Yes, I am not going to check every time someone replies to you or anyone else and make sure that they are "actually responding" to you. If you think someone is breaking the rules and report the post, I will look and see if I think they are breaking the rules, but "Not answering my question, or going off on what I consider to be an irrelevant tangent," while annoying, is not a violation of the rules.
You can also be selective about who you engage with. Some people here are very low-quality posters and I pretty much ignore them except when they are being reported for being particularly shitty. Some people are worth talking to and some aren't. There are definitely some people who think that about me.
More options
Context Copy link