This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
That may indeed be possible but I try and keep personal motivations out of analysis as much as I can. Not that he can't be morally disgusted (and indeed, most people should be) but since it is impossible to debate the personal beliefs of someone I do not personally know, I don't usually comment on it.
I am aware that assigning political motivations to things that public figures do can come off as conspiratorial and uncharitable at times. I didn't mean to imply that he was some sort of Machiavellian figure. I'm just attempting to analyze it through a realpolitik lens - which, indeed, diminishes the personal.
If we want to apply a realpolitik lens to this framing, then go full sociopolitical grand theory of the world state. Such a grand theory can be all encompassing to the point of uselessness, but perhaps lets drill down specifically to the aspect directly at play: a pattern of repeated horrific criminality has been committed by the same communities over a long period of time and a wide geographic range. There are more and more instances of this happening, despite nearly a decade of awareness. Why?
The repeated calls for inquiries and fact finding is because all that has been done so far is inadequate to address the civilizationally destructive truth poisoning this global experiment of a unified borderless world we are unwillingly thrust into: people are in fact different , and some people have vastly different decision making heuristics due to inherently different values.
People doing bad things because they have bad information is technically a solvable problem, because they can be rehabilitated or informed enough to remap their payoff matrix to be in line with functioning society. Increase probability of being incarcerated for crime, crime is no longer a payoff. That is technically speaking a solvable social problem.
The problem here is that there is a group of people that keep coming up as a distinct category that explicitly demonstrates a totally different value matrix. The golden path of economic liberalism and maximal freedoms for women is not a paradise to be admired, but a bounty to be plundered. Western society in the 1990s and 2000s was high off winning the cold war, fat on wealth and weak in will, surrendering its children to foreign rapists on the twin altars of multiculturalism and contempt. Sexually libertine children were not viewed as free agents exercising their will in an era of peace, but easy targets for cultures that decidedly calculated the payoff for raping children was so high when the consequences were so insignificant.
These value matrices are not set in stone. But what we have seen is that whatever the western response has been to islamic terrorism and rape, it has been effectively surrender. The borders remain open, the streets remain uncivil, the rapists remain free. These foreigners took advantage of temporary weakness to raid a peaceful community that opened its gates and turned a blind eye to the ongoing pillaging.
The westerners still insist that the rights of the rapists must be protected, that the ECHR is a sacrosanct document, that imprisoning vile rapists is too costly, that denying the continued mass importation of the family of rapists and murderers on the grounds of human rights is impossible to stop because of some document written 70 years ago. The invaders have raided the peaceful village, raping freely and taking their spoils. In response the village has opened its hidden coffers to invite the invaders to change their ways, unbarred its doors to make the invaders feel welcome, castigate its own people for complaining about the predators of the invaders.
The decision making matrix of people are not static, they evolve in response to changing circumstances, and the matrix presented by the west thus far has been to increase its total surrender to invading islamists. In the face of this heuristic, is it not inevitable that the islamists will see fit to continue, if not intensify, what they have done with no expectation of consequence?
To depersonalize Musks own theoretical antipathy to islamic rapists and posit a grander theory of mind would come closer to the above analysis, that there is a civilizational rot occurring and that Musk is leveraging his massive influence to bring attention to and indeed influence a change in the decision matrix. A change not of the islamists, who Musk cares not about because tribal mirpuris are worthless even after multiple generations living in the west, but of the west that opens its gates. Musk may not be able to muster the militia and bar the gates of the village, but he can at least say that continuing to pretend the invaders have the same values is madness. If an inquiry reveals that the invaders fundamentally hold the values of the west in eternal contempt precisely because it is a foreign value irrespective of its theoretical merit and that the west is simply a prize to be plundered repeatedly with such little effort, then it definitively annihilates nearly 50 years of universalist values, and reveals an intransigent terrorist group within the midst of a population. The UK still hasn't addressed the traveler issue, so I don't imagine solving the Tower Hamlets and Birmingham islamist enclaves will be an easier task. But at least exiling them to their own territories and not pretending they're Just Like Us will be a step in the right direction.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link