Be advised; this thread is not for serious in depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
Friday Fun Thread for October 14, 2022
- 70
- 9
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
So, what are you reading?
I finished Récit d'un paysan russe this week, which is a book in Russian published by Institut d'études slaves in Paris. It's the memoires of a Russian émigré, Ivan Stolyarov, who, unlike most of them, was actually born and grew up a peasant.
The gap between the peasantry and everyone else around the turn of the 20th century is simply astonishing. People like to say that Russian burghers, living in their posads with their vegetable gardens were basically peasants, but the gap between them and actual village peasants that were living like it wasn't 1900, but 1800, 1700 even, is hard to comprehend without reading a book like this. I guess you might find people living like this in India and SE Asia these days, but back then the peasants were the majority of Russians. Uplifting them must've been a herculean task for the Bolsheviks (and they extracted a terrible cost from them in return).
The book this book reminds me of the most is, surprisingly, Incandescence by Greg Egan, one of his less popular novels. In it an alien civilization, faced with an imminent destruction of their homeworld, engineered themselves into a very hardy water bear kind of creatures, but with a twist. In usual circumstances, they would grow up, live and die in ignorance, content to toil for their daily grub. However, if the gestation happened in times of ecological stress, they would be born increasingly smart and driven to ensure the survival of the population. Two human explorers are brought to a boring and stable asteroid populated with these creatures and they learn that since the process is stochastic, there are individuals who are smart and driven and very lonely even in the most stable conditions.
Récit d'un paysan russe is basically the thoughts of one such creature. There's no vitriolic hatred of peasantry there in the style of Maxim Gorky, Stolyarov understands that the cruelty and small-mindedness are not people's personal failings, you can't blame them all for not being like Stolyarov or Douglass, but nor can you ignore the system and the culture that holds these people back.
I suppose no English translation exists?
Also this sort of peasant literature was a big thing in Turkish back in the 50s. It had big soviet support so that sort of politics is always visible but I remember reading plenty of books written by ex peasants describing many elements of peasant life as a kid.
I don't think one exists. There's a review, but I couldn't find a complete translation.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
After appreciating Mikhail Elizarov's songs I decided to check out his books, starting with Librarian.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link