This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I mean, part of the problem if you want to make a big umbrella term is that there are extremely-clear fault lines among the online right - some of them big enough to make people sometimes "cross the floor" - which mean the people on opposite sides of those fault lines have no real interest in an umbrella term.
The two biggest ones are probably HBD - specifically whether one subscribes to it at all, and then whether one who subscribes to it is specifically a neo-Nazi. Lots of online rightists are still repulsed by HBD, and a lot of HBDers are repulsed by the particular package of Nazism (note how there are a ton of HBDers here who still yell at SS).
But on a broader level, there isn't exactly a unifying ideology to the online right; there's a unifying experience of "I got censured/punished for questioning SJ", but because SJ enforces orthodoxy on a wide variety of topics there's no requirement to have even one factual holding or policy preference in common between any two members of the online right, let alone all of them; they just wind up in the same haunts and often in coalition by default, because alt-tech mostly takes everyone and SJ's a bigger threat than each other.
And yet, there are still umbrella or umbrella-ish terms. "Based", "dissident right", "alt-right" (the racial meaning of the last has somewhat been worn away). There is a dizzying variety of more-specific terms because these people disagree with each other on a lot of things and it's useful to have words for the different subgroups.
More options
Context Copy link