This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Right but neither the red wedding nor twincest actually work out for the perpetrators. The Frey's are being slowly murdered by outlaws in the riverlands. Cersei is on trial by the faith of the seven for fornication, and Jaime currently hates her. Meanwhile Ned's former vassals are marching on Winterfell to save his "daughter" from unwanted marriage and sexual violence.
No disagreement with you there. George's twitter is pretty bad.
A major attraction of the book series was seeing how the situation would get even more and more fucked for pretty much everyone. I consider it less nihilistic and more a semi-gleeful entertainment to be enjoyed with virtual popcorn, but maybe that's just me. Ned Stark's fate was a brilliant way to drive home the point that anyone could die at any time, even people who would in other works be protected by being considered protagonists. "Truly anyone can die and almost nobody has plot armor" may not be a big deal nowadays (because so many people have been influenced by Martin), but it was very much different from the norm when the first book was published in 1996.
I would say that it the eventual abandonment of this "no armor" stance is what made the books (and by extension, show) weaken so dramstically. By book 4, there is no one left to die: Bran, Arya, Tyrion, Jaime, and most of the other good characters could no longer be killed because they were needed for the end game, but the books continued to introduce an unending cast of disposable, boring POVs (e.g., everything to do with pirates, the stupid Lady Stoneheart plot). Even Jon Snow's resurrection was predictable.
You aren’t entirely wrong. IMO having Jon Snow be safe and Tyrion probably but not quite guaranteed safe was fine, but the rest should have been as disposable as everyone else. Also agreed about the extra plots.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Nothing works out for anyone. It's nihilistic. Probably one of the reasons Martin hasn't written more is the only thematically appropriate ending is "rocks fall, everyone dies".
The twincest produces the insane Joffrey, in addition to its other issues.
I reject this framing completely. Is Macbeth nihilistic? Romeo and Juliet? King Lear? Just because it's a tragedy doesn't mean that the author and the writing don't believe in anything.
Wrong Shakespeare plays; you missed Hamlet. Where the White Walkers (or at least Norweigans) do indeed take over Denmark.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
The last episode of the show that I watched was the one where the wall is finally breached. My headcannon is that everyone died after that. The End. I have not and will not watch the next episode. It would be a fitting end to Martin's story.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link