This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Depends on who it is.
To someone who does understand, I'm not sure God 'bears' sin at all (outside of 'bearing' the diminishment it takes to manually fix something and the frustration that the thing you made to accomplish a task does not, in fact, do that thing; grace is "didn't and shouldn't have to fix it, did it anyway"). I think God treats individual humans much like I treat computer programs- I guess I 'bear' wrong answers (and there is some physical pain that results when the program gives me wrong answers, don't get me wrong), but this is "I put a training sequence into an LLM and if it doesn't ultimately align to my desired outputs in [timeframe] I'm not bound to accept the results -> model that generated them". It's not like there's anything binding God to do anything, anyway. [Though 'bearing' does have implications if God operates/"simulates" the universe as part of himself.]
To someone who does/will not understand I'd emphasize it in the same terms they already do understand, where the [Living] Law/King/Father is [personally] aggrieved and angered every single time someone contravenes direct orders, either because they will intentionally misunderstand the spirit of what He said, because questioning the dominant interpretation of what He said is not an efficient or effective use of their time, or because they don't know/want to know how to start looking for that spirit.
For what it's worth I wouldn't come up with this answer without having encountered this framing referenced in another comment here and being frustrated by seeing people who don't quite know what to do with someone on the same 'level' as they are (and frustrated that most Christian content has the emphasis on the 2nd or 3rd 'child' as the Jewish one described above- I guess that explains why the Church is as anti-intellectual as it is but Judaism, with its explicit adherence to rules qua rules and not the... fuzziness of Christianity, doesn't have that problem as much). Which also answers a few other questions about how and what I should say, why, where I did this instinctively/unintentionally, and what to promote with people I know act on each of those levels- I do grow by reading and writing here, it's just that I have problems turning that growth into solid results.
More options
Context Copy link