This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
No, the public doesn't really care about this and even if they did care about this after they've had a bullhorn directed at them telling them they should care about it, it's not the reason why Gaetz stepped down or wasn't able to be confirmed without huge political capital being spent. It was because Washington DC hates him for a few reasons having nothing to do with these alleged "ethics" violations. The main reason was he took out GOP leadership McCarthy when the majority of the conference wanted the McCarthy gravy-train to keep rolling. The reason why they hate him is he doesn't play ball the way the way they all play ball and admits too much about how Washington actually works. He has money and he has grass-roots support so he doesn't need them. Full stop. This isn't about the pearl clutching and jowl-shaking politicians on TV claiming it's because he paid women to have sex with him and it's high time we stop playing along like it is.
Also, with the long list of people who have occupied the position of "the nation's top law enforcement officer," a man whose worst skeleton is he paid women to have sex with him and may have had sex with a 17 year old who had a real Florida ID confirming her age was 19 would be a big improvement over the majority of lawless, vindictive clowns who have occupied it over the last 5 or 6 administrations.
And the sad thing is the allegations about him paying women to have sex are nonsense. The "credibility" issue with witnesses is they were caught lying about details in their allegation and it looks like they were paid for it in the first place and it's also why the complete DOJ and House report won't be released.
Bullshit. I wanted a Trump Attorney General who'd round up and publicly execute all of the political insiders (probably hundreds of thousands of them) who participate in the secret organized mass abduction, enslavement, rape, torture, and murder of children and adolescents. (Epstein. Pizzagate. Not QAnon. QAnon was an obvious feint for retard boomers who just want to be told to relax.) It's already been pretty obvious since early in Trump's first term that he was in fact one of those political insiders, but the ridiculously sleazy Gaetz ever getting anywhere near the Attorney General position is one of the most blatant fuck yous to the American public I've ever seen. Rotten, the lot of them.
Unfortunately, I think Matt Gaetz may have been the most likely person to do that. If politicians banging prosties qualifies for "ridiculously sleazy," boy do I have something to tell you about your typical Washington DC upstanding politician. When Madison Cawthorn tattled to everyone about the regular drug-fueled sex parties, he wasn't talking about some small minority in the hallowed halls of Congress.
Sadly, it looks like the smear campaign has convinced you Gaetz is one of them when it looks like he wasn't and that's the problem. The Beltway GOP doesn't care that Gaetz bangs out prosties (even if they thought it was true), they don't like that he toppled McCarthy and threatened harmed their gravytrain by demanding they do the things they promise their voters. Both sides don't like Gaetz because he doesn't play the game the way they want it played. That's it.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link