site banner
PaperclipPerfector  3d ago (text post)   16381 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 11, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Alright, I'll bite.

  1. 85% chance he gets most loop holes closed. 70% he makes the lives of illegal residents on average worse in some measurable way. 50% chance we get some wide spread e-verify leading to lots of self deportations. 40% chance net migration(new arrivals - deportation of any sort) is negative over his term. 10% chance anything that actually looks like wide spread forced deportation of Illegal immigrants that aren't breaking non-immigration related laws.
  2. 25% only because I don't think the bar for largest in history is really that large and just sending known criminals back might qualify.
  3. 25% chance only because I think he won't really do the tariff thing and I'm going to be super lenient on what counts as lower inflation. If he means deflation and intends to do the tariffs then more like 2%.
  4. Aren't we already basically there? Near there? This site seems to think China leads us by a bit in total MTOE "Million tons of oil equivalent" which seems like something we can't really reverse easily. Maybe if AI goes super big and the data centers live in the US and we produce a bunch of nuclear to run them in 10 years but I don't think we would even really want to put that much effort into this. 20% chance and it'd probably be a mistake to make this a goal.
  5. Depends on what the definition of this is. I could certainly see us bringing more production home in automated factories, I don't think it'd be the win for the middle class people expect it to be. Not sure how to formalize this into a prediction. 70% chance our net trade balance goes up? Almost impossible to do this while fighting inflation.
  6. 60% on tax cuts for the middle class entirely paid for by deficit spending. I don't know about the no tax on tips thing, it's a really quite bad idea. Get ready to be basically required to tip for everything. Bonuses will be renamed tips.
  7. 85% only because Trump himself is a litigious goblin man who obviously doesn't care about freedom of speech but for the branding.
  8. World war three doesn't happen 98%. Peace in the middle easy 10%, almost nothing to do with Trump but he would take credit. Iron Eagle dome 3%, doesn't even really make sense and the attempt is responsible for a lot of the 2% chance ww3 happens, undermining MAD is BAD.
  9. Don't know what this means really.
  10. Don't know how to make this a prediction. There isn't really a migrant crime epidemic. He might do something with Mexico to fight the cartels but I doubt it would succeed, don't know how to make it into a prediction though.

85% only because Trump himself is a litigious goblin man who obviously don't care about freedom of speech but for the branding.

Hah, quite a line right here! but fair. Thanks for biting friend.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats