Transnational Thursday is a thread for people to discuss international news, foreign policy or international relations history. Feel free as well to drop in with coverage of countries you’re interested in, talk about ongoing dynamics like the wars in Israel or Ukraine, or even just whatever you’re reading.
- 6
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Israel has begin bombing targets in Tehran. No word yet on the specific sites or casualties.
Looks like Israel took a very conservative route. Only military objects - which given Iran government a lot of deniability, you can't just come to a military base and see what really has been blown up there, so Iranians can claim anything they want internally about the damage. I understand a lot of air defense was hit, which serves double purpose: first, showing Iranians that they are vulnerable (since if air defense can't even protect itself, no chance they can protect anything else), and second, enabling further strikes with much more damaging results if they don't get the message. It also led to extremely low number of casualties, could probably be much higher if industry or infrastructure objects were hit. So basically Israel is telling Iran "we can hurt you real bad, but we choosing not to, take the message and calm down". We'll see if they would.
More options
Context Copy link
Netanyahu is making the most of his time before November 6th. He knows that a Kamala fumble on this could tank her campaign. So dude is bombing away her her hands are tied.
Iran, even more than Russia, is an information vacuum for western media. How stable is Khamenei's hold on Iran? Their economy is in the shitter. Khamenei at 85, could drop dead anytime. Their 2nd in command (Riasi) died this year. Now Iran has lost its proxies & is getting pummeled on their home ground. Their nuclear program has been knee-capped
Iran looks poised for a dirty succession battle. Iran has been run by clerics since the Shah was pushed out. So, the next supreme leader would need to be a cleric. Riasi was being groomed as a fellow Ayatollah and Prime minister, but he's dead. The current PM is a moderate doctor with insufficient religious creds. Khamenei's son is an Ayatollah, but isn't well liked. And every other person in running is either just as old (80+) or too weak.
There's a stark difference in Tehran's liberal temperament vs the hyper-conservative country side. I don't see Iran staying in it's Post-80s backwater state for much longer. Iran has the same HDI as China & with infinite oil. As a free market economy, it could pass Turkey/Mexico in productivity within a decade or two. With Hezbollah and Hamas defused, what's the point of being an anti-western Shia Islamist nation ?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link