This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Hit the gym!
If people treat bodybuilding as a cure for depression, by definition there's going to be a load of depressed people at the gym, unless it really would work instantaneously in a "lift a barbell, depression gone for good" way.
LOL, well said -- it would be like trying to discredit psychiatry by observing that their waiting rooms are full of depressed people.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I think there's also, as usual, a case of diminishing returns here. If you're inactive, and you start exercising regularly and eating healthily, I don't doubt that's good for mental health (as well as physical health obviously). But once you pass the point of 'reasonably fit and healthy' I find it hard to believe gym-going is does anything more for you mentally than any other hobby.
I think there are more potential gains than you imply. I can run a 7.5 minute mile and I feel pretty good. Running a 6 minute mile would probably make me feel even better, psychologically of course for achieving a goal, but also just in my daily fitness. It won't be as huge as the difference between 9 minutes and 7.5 minutes, but it will certainly be abig improvement.
I suppose what I'm trying to say is that returns do diminish, but never to the point where shaving another minute off my mile would equivalent to finally painting the entire map in Europa Universalis while playing as the Knights of Saint John. The fitness gains would still provide way more benefit.
Yeah, certainly the fitness gains will keep increasing, but my point is that beyond a certain level fitness isn't necessarily making you that much 'healthier', at that point the goals are fairly arbitrary. Which is fine, even good, but no different to the goal of completing a good stamp collection or finishing restoring an old car.
I understand. The point I perhaps failed to make is that the point of diminishing returns for exercise is quite high IMO, especially relative to the amount of effort people put into keeping fit. Put another way, very very few people are at the point where they wouldn't benefit from getting fitter, including people who exercise regularly. I think you hit "completing a stamp collection" levels of marginal return when you're, say, trying to shave 5% off your half marathon time or whatever (probably before then, but I'm just trying to illustrate the point).
Edit: I reread my post and I see that I didn't acknowledge that there is eventually a point of diminishing returns. Oops. I agree with you on that point.
Sure, I mostly agree with that. Though I think that's mostly a reflection of how unhealthy America/Britain etc. is as a society
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Have you tried deleting Facebook and getting a lawyer?
?
The universal meme advice for men's problems is "delete Facebook, hit the gym, lawyer up".
More options
Context Copy link
Just a dumb joke, don’t mind me
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link