This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Is that true? I wasn't aware.
According to the paper the report is based on, yes. See there under "Results:Gender Differences".
Armchair hypothesis from someone with no medical training: FTMs who start taking testosterone will see a big spike in athletic ability (testosterone is essentially a PED in this context). Adult MTFs who start hormone therapy will see a reduction in athletic ability, but they've already gone through male puberty and the changes that it wrought on their bodies (bone density, lung capacity) are pretty much hard-coded, so even though they'll have reduced athletic ability, it'll still be a lot closer to the male average than the female. And if you were already a professional athlete prior to commencing hormone therapy (e.g. Lia Thomas) your athletic ability was already dramatically higher than the male average: all hormone therapy will do is reduce it to something approximating the male average (or maybe within one standard deviation below), which is still radically higher than the female average (or even many professional female athletes).
There could be a similar mechanism at play when it comes to violent criminality. Adult FTMs who start taking testosterone will see a spike in aggression and hence become more prone to violent criminality. When adult MTFs start hormone therapy, their testosterone levels will reduce and they will see reduced levels of aggression as a result, but their testosterone levels might still be within one standard deviation below the male mean. Indeed, if you were already an unusually aggressive/violent man prior to starting hormone therapy, it probably meant that your testosterone levels were unusually high, so starting a hormone therapy regimen might only have reduced your testosterone levels to the male average or something approximating it.
The end result is that FTMs on hormones have significantly higher rates of violent criminality than the female average (i.e. more similar to the male average) and MTFs have rates of violent criminality which are maybe marginally lower than the male average, but this cashes out as a rounding error for most intents and purposes.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link