This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
You were ready to go to war a decade ago. Now you're happy just to chat about it online. I would think that to any reasonable person, it seems like you feel more safe now.
So we've moved from you talking about facts, to you talking about your feelings, to you engaging in overconfident speculation about my feelings. This does not seem like a promising progression. With due respect, I do not particularly trust your assessments of what a "reasonable person" should think.
I do not, in fact, feel safer now. I found religion, which means I'm willing to commit to rejecting the hatred that used to motivate me, and it means I'm willing to contemplate dire outcomes with a greater degree of equanimity than I used to possess. That is why the tenor of my comments has changed; I don't hate Blues less, but I am attempting to feed and express that hatred as little as possible.
The other part of it is that four years ago, I believed that the coordination problem was fundamental, and that Blue Tribe had a probable path to victory unless Red Tribe could find a solution to it. I no longer believe that.
So you feel less safe but more assured of an after life? Shouldn't that make you feel more safe since worst case scenario you get to spend eternity in heaven?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link