This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Two methods to get Ukraine manpower:
Congress passes the Lafayette Act, which allows any US military serviceman to request a leave of absence to serve in the military of friendly government. While in service of a friendly government, the servicemen would continue to accrue seniority and promotions. Repeat across NATO. This gets trained specialists over there.
EU countries pass a law granting visas for the families of Ukraine volunteers from third countries who complete five years of honorable service or die in combat. This would produce vast quantities of warm bodies.
Do them both and Russia could be drained, and the cost of the war can grind on, and the human being lawnmower can chop chop chop, and the Black Sea can remain a warzone for another decade, and weapons manufacturers can make trillions, and a million more men can die over places I've never heard of and wouldn't be able to tell apart whether they were in Russia or Ukraine.
I think you overestimate how much people want to get into Europe legally. People will "risk their life", but there's going through a long arduous journey and there's getting shelled by rocket artillery. I know which I'd rather pick. Not to mention the quality of such troops. Ukraine is already suffering from training issues due to the turnover and pèle-mèle hardware. Adding language barrier into the mix is not going to help matters.
Poaching servicemen from western countries is a more realistic proposition, then you are actually getting people trained on the hardware they're going to use and who can fight.
But then, which is my point, how close is this from just being a NATO war against Russia in all but name, with the nuclear implications this brings? How long can both sides pretend that theirs is just a special military operation?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link