This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Bleeding hearts cave because they think their social circles will cave as well. It is a self reinforcing cycle by which everyone presumes social sanction from their peers for not abiding by the presumed moral diktats of their community.
In small groups Europeans, even ostensibly liberal MNC civil servant types, will sotto voce voice their concerns that the muslim population is not in fact responding well to 'integration' overtures, and that the community regularly displays antisocial behavior. More daring ones would explicate a desire to remove the problem, but everyone has this shadow of Respectability hanging over them preventing voicing out of concrete solutions. At every level there is this presumption that voicing out objections will lead to an institutional witch hunt from a media ecosystem eager for scalps. Just look at lemonde for examples of how it is impossible to speak negatively of migrants.
This brings back the main issue of who is benefitting, and the reality is that small town girls stabbed by rwandan migrants or blown up in a concert or stabbed in parks or raped by the thousands does not affect the urban PMC. The urban PMC needs to capture the levers of power and influence, and the current holder of that lever is the centre right normies. Their suffering means nothing to the left. Look at how Novara Media or Owen Jones talk about the grooming gang scandals. The enemy must remain the racist and the normie, because the muslim is a pliant pawn the left can exploit fearlessly eternally.
This is of course wrong, and literally every arab country shows their socialist-islamist alliances dissolve when the islamists get a whiff of power and execute their socialist allies in the street. The left does not seem to care about its suicide as long as it can destroy the right, for it seeks just that brief moment in the sun where it can scream 'SEE REAL COMMUNISM CAN WORK'
I think it's just pure arrogance; it's not gonna fail, it can't fail.
Western leftists are acting as if this is the height of empire and no foreign threat matters as much as their fellow whites on the wrong side of their feud. The Muslims who are not assimilating are just harmless compared to some football hooligans carrying the wrong flag being proven right about the ray guns. That is intolerable and dangerous.
It's fascinating to watch. All of the arrogance and narcissism of arch-imperialists with none of the in-group preference or survival instinct you need when you actually are trying to conquer people.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link