This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Why do you think that the goals of either Netanyahu or the Republicans involve ending the war?
Netanyahu will almost certainly lose power, and quite possibly go to jail, as soon as the war is over. Republicans draw political advantage from supporting Israel, not from Israel being at peace. When Israel is at peace and doing well, there's not much public supporting of Israel to be done.
There's also a subset of Evangelicals who hold a prophetic belief that Israel's wars are a signal of the end times, and aren't really interested in "peace in the middle east" because that is against prophecy and therefore some mix of undesirable and categorically impossible anyway.
Republicans, and many Democrats, want to show allegiance and friendship to Israel. Part of the Wilsonian problem of American foreign policy has been that a liberal America has no friends, other than perhaps to some extent England and Australia. It can't have friends and have morality, friendship means nothing if it doesn't super-cede morality to at least some degree. If I treat you only according to ethics when you're right and when you're wrong, you're not my friend, you're just another node in the matrix. You're a friend when I'm by your side, right or wrong. If I'm there when you're wrong you can count on me. It's precisely because Netanyahu is unpopular, and the war has gone from punitive expedition to mowing the grass to genocidal farce, that supporting it has so much value for the Zionist congress critter. He can bend the knee so much farther when Israel is already in the gutter.
Israel's next elections are scheduled for October, 2026. Once the war is over, Netanyahu has no reason at all to hold them early and his coalition isn't in incredible danger of breaking up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Benjamin_Netanyahu?wprov=sfti1
I'm not going to pretend I have a deep understanding of Israeli politics, but his coalition has already threatened to break up despite the war, and prior to October there was a consistent drumbeat in the newspapers of stories on his corruption trials closing in. Maybe it's foreign overreactions, but it seems convenient to suddenly be saying that you don't switch horses midstream.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link