This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The amount of people who won't vote for a senile candidate but would vote for someone else must be greater than the Biden loyalists, right?
It doesn't really matter as long as the raw number of people who will throw a tantrum and refuse to vote for the D candidate is large enough that you'll lose.
If a sufficient percentage of people, see this insane person (aside to @2rafa, this is the straw-donor plaintiff for a future lawsuit against the Biden campaign for passing funds to a new candidate illegally), will only vote for Biden and not for a new candidate for reasons that might be absurd; then it doesn't matter if the group of people who won't vote for a senile candidate is larger or smaller. The Democrats can't afford to lose any part of the party, or they lose the election. They're going to try very hard to thread the needle and get everyone on board before they give up and make the Sophie's Choice of whether to lose by a lot or a little.
A handful of insane people on twitter may not represent a large enough voting bloc to matter. Also the person in that tweet would definitely vote for any dem, I'm guessing.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
The Biden camp isn't simply Biden loyalists, but the broader Obama wing of the party. An institutional rebellion of scale sufficient to topple Biden also topples a lot of them.
Their place in the party is more or less still secure whether Biden wins or loses the election. It's far less secure if the party is subject to a sudden takeover, who then needs to go through the long and disruptive process of establishing their own loyalists and their own allies across the party machinery.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link